+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Duarte, CA
    Posts
    153

    Idle mines and tighter regulations

    BILL ANALYSIS

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 108|
    |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
    |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
    |(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) | |
    |327-4478 | |
    ------------------------------------------------------------


    THIRD READING

    Bill No: SB 108
    Author: Rubio (D)
    Amended: 5/3/11
    Vote: 21


    SENATE NATURAL RES. AND WATER COMMITTEE : 9-0, 4/26/11
    AYES: Pavley, La Malfa, Cannella, Evans, Fuller, Kehoe,
    Padilla, Simitian, Wolk

    SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 8-0, 5/16/11
    AYES: Kehoe, Alquist, Emmerson, Lieu, Pavley, Price,
    Runner, Steinberg
    NO VOTE RECORDED: Walters

    SUBJECT : Surface mining: idle mines

    SOURCE : California Construction and Industrial
    Materials Association

    DIGEST : This bill changes the standard for classifying a
    surface mine as idle, and also authorizes the extension of
    an approved interim management plan (IMP) for a surface
    mine.

    ANALYSIS : Existing law, under the Surface Mining and
    Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975:

    1. Prohibits a person from conducting a surface mining
    operation unless, among other things, a reclamation plan
    has been submitted to and approved by the lead agency
    CONTINUED

    SB 108
    Page
    2

    for the operation.

    2. Requires an operator, within 90 days of a surface mining
    operation becoming idle, to submit to the lead agency
    for review and approval, an IMP.

    3. Defines "idle" to mean a curtailment for a period of one
    year or more of surface mining operations by more than
    90 percent of the operation's previous maximum annual
    mineral production, with the intent to resume those
    surface mining operations at a future date.

    4. Requires a surface mining operation that remains idle
    for over one year after becoming idle, without obtaining
    approval of an IMP, in certain circumstances, to be
    considered abandoned and requires the operator to
    commence and complete reclamation in accordance with the
    approved reclamation plan.

    5. Authorizes an IMP to remain in effect for a period not
    to exceed five years, after which, the lead agency is
    authorized to take certain actions, including renewing
    the IMP for another period not to exceed five years, if
    the lead agency finds that the surface mining operator
    has complied fully with the IMP.

    This bill:

    1. Defines "idle" to mean that an operator of a surface
    mining operation has curtailed production at the surface
    mining operation, with the intent to resume the surface
    mining operation at a future date, for a period of one
    year or more by more than 90 percent of its maximum
    annual mineral production within any of the last five
    years.

    2. Exempt from being considered idle certain surface mining
    operations, if the operator can demonstrate that the
    surface mining operation is not in fact idle.

    3. Authorizes an IMP to remain in effect for a period not
    to exceed five years, after which, the lead agency is
    authorized to take certain actions, including renewing
    the IMP for another period not to exceed five years, if

    CONTINUED

    SB 108
    Page
    3

    the lead agency finds that the surface mining operator
    has complied fully with the IMP.

    4. Authorizes the lead agency to continuously renew the IMP
    for additional five-year periods, if the lead agency
    finds that the surface mining operator has complied
    fully with the IMP.

    Background

    SMARA requires that a mine operator prepare a reclamation
    plan that is approved by the lead agency, which is usually
    a local government. When an operator decides to idle a
    surface mining operation, SMARA requires the operator to
    prepare an IMP for approval by the lead agency. Idle mines
    are defined as those at which operations are curtailed for
    a period of one year or more by more than 90 percent of the
    previous maximum annual mineral production and where there
    is an intent to resume surface mining operations at a
    future date. If there is no intent to resume mining, a
    mine is considered either active (and presumably going
    through the reclamation process) or abandoned.

    When a mine is idled, SMARA requires an IMP to be submitted
    to the lead agency for review and approval within 90 days.
    The lead agency has 60 days to review and approve the IMP,
    although there are provisions in the law for these
    deadlines to be extended upon mutual agreement. Because
    the IMP is considered an amendment to a reclamation plan,
    it is also subject to review by the Department of
    Conservation (CDC). A lead agency must respond in writing
    to any comments from the CDC. Typically, the IMP addresses
    public health and safety issues that must be addressed
    until operations are resumed and often include runoff,
    drainage, erosion control, and temporary fencing.

    SMARA also provides for an appeals process if the lead
    agency denies approval of the IMP. IMPs may remain in
    effect for a period not to exceed five years. At that
    point, the lead agency may renew the IMP for another five
    year period if the operator is in compliance with SMARA.
    If that does not happen, the operator must begin mining or
    reclamation. If the plan is not filed, the mine is
    considered abandoned and the operator is responsible for

    CONTINUED

    SB 108
    Page
    4

    beginning the reclamation process. In most circumstances,
    mines that have been idle for more than one year and have
    not obtained an IMP shall be considered abandoned and the
    operator must begin reclamation.

    The IMP is considered an amendment to the applicable
    reclamation plan and is not subject to the California
    Environmental Quality Act.

    Idle mines must maintain approved financial assurances for
    reclamation and like active mines, must file an annual
    report with the CDC along with appropriate reporting fees,
    and are subject to annual inspections.

    FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
    Local: No

    According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

    Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

    Major Provisions 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Fund

    Oversight of idle mine $85 $100
    $100Special *
    classification

    * Mine Reclamation Account.

    SUPPORT : (Verified 5/17/11)

    California Construction and Industrial Materials
    Association (source)
    Basic Resources, Inc.
    Beacon Concrete Inc.
    California Cement Manufacturers Environmental Coalition
    Holliday Rock Company, Inc.
    Lehigh Hanson
    National Cement Company of California, Inc.
    Teichert & Son, Inc.
    Vulcan Materials Company, Western Division
    West Coast Aggregates, Inc.

    CONTINUED

    SB 108
    Page
    5

    ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : The author's office and sponsor,
    the California Construction Industrial Materials
    Association (CalCIMA) state that this bill is needed
    because the current definition of "idle" is unnecessarily
    narrow and not suitable for mines facing ebbs or spikes in
    demand caused by large public works projects or,
    alternatively, depressed construction activities. The
    author and CalCIMA point out that a year or two of high
    demand followed by a drop-off in demand could trigger a
    requirement for an IMP as would a depressed economy that
    causes a longer-term decrease in demand.

    The author and sponsor also state that the determination of
    "idle" when made by a lead agency could result in the
    immediate initiation of reclamation without the operator
    being aware of that determination. They are also concerned
    that existing law is ambiguous regarding how many IMP
    renewals may be granted by a lead agency.

    Several mining companies are in support of this bill and
    they all assert that current law inadvertently penalizes
    operators who experience decreased construction activity.
    They strongly support provisions in SMARA that would
    provide expanded opportunities to file IMPs.

    CTW:kc 5/17/11 Senate Floor Analyses

    SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE

    **** END ****

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Napa, California, 94558
    Posts
    35
    How does this requirement affect patent claims? Patent claims are considered private property, and not subject to abandonment.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Duarte, CA
    Posts
    153
    Best I can tell, It affects all mines. Maybe someone else has more insight?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Fernley, NV
    Age
    44
    Posts
    6
    SMARA requires that a mine operator prepare a reclamation
    plan that is approved by the lead agency, which is usually
    a local government.

    This is what is wrong with big government. They write legislation, but in this paragraph, they don't even know who the lead agency is...(Usually a government agency?)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Napa, California, 94558
    Posts
    35
    Another Corrupt law for the state to destroy the rights of miners and a free people in California.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Napa, California, 94558
    Posts
    35
    The lead Agency is the federal Government as the rules for Abandonment are under the jurisdiction of the Federal law, not the State law.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts